Sunday, August 18, 2013

Post 10-Immigration and the Devil's Highway

Hi all! Hope everyone has had a great summer! It's almost back to school time for me! I'm really excited about my classes too, especially my American Social Welfare Policy class! But anywho, my last topic for the summer is U.S. immigration policy.

Now to start off, the experience of immigrants has always been a difficult one, with one exception. Only one group of immigrants have ever had a positive experience with natives: the first Anglo-Saxon settlers in the 17th century. The natives in this case were Native Americans, and as we all know they didn't get the best end of the stick. When Anglo-Saxon Europeans settled, Native Americans were disrespectfully called Indians, murdered, and decimated by diseases brought to the "New World" by the Europeans. Since most of our textbooks are written with an Anglo-Saxon central viewpoint, the plight of the Native Americans is largely downplayed. As are the experiences of immigrant groups that came after the Anglo-Saxons. The Chinese, the Germans, the Irish (who were not considered white until later), and of course African Americans faced negative experiences that linger still today including discrimination in housing policy, forced, unpaid labor, and voter suppression. Although these groups are now seen as legitimate groups, as far as immigration policy goes, American society has another group of immigrants to scrutinize: Hispanics. And it is the plight of Hispanic immigrants that we will examine in this post.
Now some of you may wonder why there is renewed interest with immigration policy this year. The main reason is that the Republican party is looking to renew its image with Hispanic voters. After the 2012 presidential election, where Hispanics/Latinos voted for President Obama over Governor Romney in a 71% to 27% landslide. In an effort to push for immigration reform (which Democrats have supported for years because it was the right thing to do, not the thing to do to get votes) Republican Senators John McCain (a rare Republican who has been a long time immigration reformer), Jeff Flake, Marco Rubio, and Lindsey Graham worked with Democratic senators Dick Durbin, Michael Bennett, Bob Menendez, and Chuck Schumer to create a comprehensive bill to deal with our current immigration problem.
Now a lot of people criticize this bill because it contains "amnesty" and not enough "border security". Here's the thing, we do have a lot of undocumented immigrants, almost 12 million to be as precise as possible. Of those 12 million, the vast majority are contributing to their communities with hard work. Also, young adults who came here as children brought by their parents are facing roadblocks to jobs, driver's licenses, and college enrollment because they are not considered "legal" citizens, even though they have served in out military and pledged only to out flag. So why I ask, is it such a big deal to create a pathway to citizenship? These immigrants may be "taking jobs", but they are mostly the jobs that most white Americans look down on (roofing, landscaping, maid servicing, and working in fast food restaurants to name a few). Also, if the 12 million undocumented were to become citizens, they would contribute in the form of taxation, effectively cutting the deficit in half, something that Republicans against "amnesty" constantly push for.
As always, there is another side to the immigrant story. Like other immigrant groups, Latinos face extreme poverty in Mexico and other countries in the Caribbean and Latin America. The bight light of opportunity that is America provides a sense of hope that they will be able to provide for their family and offer a better life for their children. Legal immigration takes money and can take up to 20 years. Would you live in poverty and watch your children suffer this long? Most would not. The new immigration bill gives hard working undocumented immigrants a chance to become "legal". Along with a pathway to citizenship, the bill allows for permanent residence for international university students who have received science, technology, engineering, or math degrees at colleges in the U.S., cracking down on businesses who pay immigrants under the table, and improving e-verify systems that employers can use.
This bill offers a comprehensive solution to an important moral and economic issue. When the U.S. closes its doors to immigrant populations, we become worse off. It has been the ideas of immigrants who have propelled us forward for centuries. The economy of the colonies was built on the backs of African immigrant slave labor, our railroads were built by the Chinese, the Germans and Irish built our canals, bridges, and skyscrapers in the Northeast, Jewish immigrants helped to build our financial sector, and Hispanics are helping to maintain housing construction in the recovering housing markets of the Southwest. Difference and diversity are key drivers of innovation and we must continue the melting pot tradition that has always been. So I challenge my readers to contact their Representatives in the Republican controlled house and ask them to vote on the Immigration bill that the Senate passed.  Watch below for highlights of the immigration debate!

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



This weeks short read is related to the comprehensive immigration bill mentioned above. "The Devil's Highway" by Luis Alberto Urrea is an interesting read about how backwards and broken immigration policy has been for the past few decades. In his book, Urrea explains the trials and tribulations faced by immigrants from Mexico to the U.S. in May 2001. The group became lost in the Southern U.S. desert and 14 of the men died from hyperthermia (the opposite of hypothermia). This book also does a great job at giving the immigrant's perspective on the dangerous crossing and the desperation that motivated their journey. I suggest this because it is a quick read, but also contains depth in human emotion and immigration policy. At 220 pages, you could probably finish in a week. So til next time, remember to think of our immigrants and the experiences that push or pull them to the U.S. And remember, investing in our immigrant populations will help us become a stronger and more structurally secure nation.

Monday, August 12, 2013

Post 9- The Implementation of the Affordable Care Act and The Meaning of Matthew

Hey friends! Now I hate to start off a good post with some bad news, but I'm afraid that I am going to have to hold off on blogging some when school gets here. I'm for sure not going to blog on Mondays anymore, but may update every other Tuesday. But we shall see. I will still share on Favebook when a new post becomes available.

Now on to some exciting news: the full implementation of the Affordable Care Act is almost here! Now for those of you who don't know, here are some of the landmark components of the "Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act" aka Obamacare:

  • No lifetime limits on money for procedures
  • Insurance companies have to use 80% of your premium payments on health procedures; if more than 20% is used otherwise, the extra is to be refunded.
  • Employers with more than 50 employees are to provide coverage to their workers. 
  • Young adults can stay on parents' insurance plan until age 26 (That's me!)
  • Medicaid expansion to those below 138% of the Federal Poverty Line (about  $32,000 a year and under). 
  • New online marketplaces, where premiums will be much cheaper because of competition for your business.
  • Individual mandate that everyone have insurance, or face penalty tax. (If someone goes to the ER, they are not turned away. They are treated and the hospital loses money, so prices go up for everyone else. Same logic that applies to what happens when someone steals from the store and prices go up for everyone else, not to say that those two scenarios are comparable. This prevents that). 
  • Tax incentives to individuals who purchase their own healthcare
  • Women will no longer have to pay higher premiums. Having a uterus is no longer a pre-existing condition. 
All of these are major provisions of Obamacare. Now, to me, all of these sound pretty great! To me, healthcare is a basic human right. As I said earlier, in my SNAP post, food and healthcare are human rights that an industrialized nation such as the U.S. should invest in and provide to its citizens in a fiscally responsible way if they can not procure them for themselves. Now, there is a lot of political debate over Obamacare, but it may not be for reasons that you think. If you care to venture onto opensecrets.org, you can look and see who politicians get their money from. Now, if you care to venture over to my friend Mitch McConnell's page, you will see that he has received half a million dollars from insurance companies since 2010, when the Affordable Care Act passed. Coincidental that Senator McConnell is one of the chief voices against the ACA. Insurance companies exist to make profits, and this law is for affordable care. You do the math and figure out which side seems right.
In the latest news, we have a group of extremist senators who want to shut down the government in order to defund Obamacare. This thought comes after the 40th vote to repeal the bill. Now, we pay our politicians to work, yes? Is it not a waste of time and thus our tax dollars if the House of Representatives votes 40 TIMES to do something that will go nowhere in the Senate and the President would veto anyway? Now if the government were to be shutdown, Obamacare would remain funded because it is part of what's called "mandatory spending" which the government has to spend no matter what. However, social security payments and military paychecks would go unpaid. So basically those threatening a shutdown would hold seniors and soldiers hostage for nothing, because Obamacare is going to be funded no matter what. Hopefully the political gamesmanship can cease and the process of insuring the uninsured can begin. For example, there are 640,000 uninsured people in Kentucky. However, 308,000 will gain coverage through Medicaid expansion while the other 332,000 will buy healthcare in the online marketplaces where they will receive discounts and tax refunds for purchasing insurance.
So what do we do then? Well the first thing is to educate yourself, especially if you are one of the 640,000 uninsured Kentuckians I mentioned. Visit healthcare.gov and read up on some of the provisions that affect you. But, if you already have insurance, you don't have to do anything! The benefits of no lifetime limits and coverage of your children until age 26 will happen automatically. Also brush up on facts and avoid fear-mongering lies. You can keep your doctor, wait times won't go up, and it is not a government scheme. Premiums are going to go down and health insurance is rising at the slowest rate in years. Remember friends, Social Security and Medicare were once very unpopular, but are they going anywhere anytime soon? This is probably the most important post I have written, so be educated and find facts on this. Don't believe the scare tactics and if you know someone who is uninsured direct them to healthcare.gov. It will be the law of the land, so let's make sure that those who need it can use it effectively. Watch Ms. Karen Finney explain some more.Or, if you are pressed for time, watch the second video where an actual doctor explains healthcare.

Visit NBCNews.com for breaking news, world news, and news about the economy



In my short read this week, I refer you to "The Meaning of Matthew" by Judy Shepard. Now if you weren't a little guy or girl back in 1998 when Matthew Shepard was murdered, you probably remember the news story. However, this book provides insight into the story of Matthew and his family. It really is one of my favorite books. LGBT persons, their families, and allies all have a way to relate to this book. Seriously buy it here or if I know you personally, you can buy it. Til next time, give life, "The Meaning of Matthew", and Obamacare a deeper read. Good night and happy reading! :)

Monday, August 5, 2013

Post 8-McConnell and Weiner

Hi all! I hope you have been brushing up on some good summer reading! Sadly, it is almost over and students will be heading back to school and parents will be sending their kiddos off to new adventures. I'm actually kind of worried about the amount of time I will have to write when my classes start. I sure will try my best to deliver to you all, but on Mondays I have 7 hours of class, so I will probably publish new posts on Fridays starting in September. But we shall see!

Now this week's big post and quick read will be about two of my favorite people: Mitch McConnell and Anthony Weiner. Now this one will be hard to write for me. Anyone who knows me knows that I LOVE politics, public policy, and issues of governance, but these two are part of the reason that so many people are turned away from politics, but I WILL TRY MY BEST to state my case that these two are the exception, not the rule. 

First we will start with good old Mitch! To keep it short, I don't really agree with Mr. McConnell on anything. I love going to UofL, but knowing that he is the "most accomplished" academic to ever come out of UofL makes me kinda queasy. But I think my biggest qualm with him came in 2010, when he stated that his number one political goal was to "make Barack Obama a one term President". Now, besides being outright disrespectful, this statement shows a serious lack of leadership from someone who is supposed to be the head guy in the Republican senate caucus. McConnell's number one goal wasn't to provide cheap healthcare for seniors, to develop Kentucky's economy, or improve national education standards; it was to defeat a political opponent who had handily won an election 2 years before. Now whether or not you agree with the President (not even I do 100% of the time), we look for our political leaders to work together on common ground issues that we all can agree on. Unfortunately it looked like Senator McConnell looked unwilling to work with this President from the start, and this statement was only the beginning of Senator McConnell's grand obstruction plans, which are still continuing today. In fact, McConnell has filibustered 420 bills in the Senate, including one of his own
Now along with his lack of leadership, I disagree strongly with Senator McConnell on several other issues. Let's start with economics. Starting back in the late 90s, the seeds of the 2008 economic crisis were sown when the Republican controlled Congress pushed for repeal of the Depression-era Glass-Steagall act that kept banks from investing on their own assets (in the case of 2008, risky mortgages that brought huge profits until the mortgages went under). Mr. McConnell was part of this deregulation of banks that let them grow so big. Fast forward ten years when the banks were going under and he voted to give the failing banks a tax payer bailout. However, when General Motors was going under, Mr. McConnell voted against a tax payer loan to keep America's 2nd largest employer going afloat (maybe because it would have stripped the UAW of thousands of members but that's for another day). This is a case where Mr. McConnell chose to put Wall Street ahead of Main Street. McConnell is also notorious for providing favors for campaign donors. He hands out legislative gifts to insurance companies, banks, and oil and gas companies. Alison Grimes kicked off her campaign this year with everyday Americans, McConnell kicked off his reelection campaign with lobbyist friends. Also, just out today, one Political Action Committee that supports Senator McConnell received a $100,000 donation....from a dead guy! Now of course his supporters say there was a computer glitch, but this story is just another suspicious view on McConnell's finance machine.
On social issues, we grow farther apart. In 2004, McConnell wanted to write discrimination against gays and lesbians into the Constitution with a Federal Marriage Amendment, making marriage between one man and one woman. He also voted against the Matthew Shephard and James Byrd Jr. Hate Crimes Prevention Act, which makes Hate Crime posecution against LGBT people and racial minority groups easier. His shoddy civil rights record continues with his participation in the war against women. He voted against  the Lily Ledbetter Fair Pay Act and the Paycheck Fairness Act both of which seek to end income inequality between men and women (women make 7 cents for every dollar that men make who do the same work). The routinely renewed Violence Against Women Act which funds programs against domestic violence such as the Center for Women and Families was rejected by McConnell.
It is this sort of do nothingness that has frustrated so many Kentuckians. Even many conservatives don't feel that he should be able to spend another 6 years in Washington. Only time will tell, but let's hope that the man who either wants to not do his job or take money for political favors will finally retire. Please search online for more of McConnell's votes at ontheissues.org and votesmart.org. I could go on for many more paragraphs, but these are the major objections I have with the Senator.

Now of course despicable politicians come in all shapes, sizes, and ideology. That's where we get to New York Mayoral candidate Anthony Weiner who I'm sure needs no introduction. The worst part about this story is that I liked him while he was in Congress before he started to make bad decisions that involved his namesake. Now that there are new allegations, I am only able to sit and ruminate on what exactly Weiner's actions mean. Now America is a very forgiving society when it comes to our celebrities. Whether or not you agree, I think that our celebrities/politicians need to hold themselves up to high standards since they are in the public eye. Also, when they do make bad decisions, they need to apologize in an honest and open manner. These apologies shouldn't be DEFENSIVE against reporters who ask why you send your junk to multiple women, your apology shouldn't come AFTER the Food Network drops your show, and your apology should be SINCERE, not scripted. Weiner is just another person who has made bad decisions, but when decision making is a key part in his job, should we REALLY give him a second chance?